Piedmont Eastside Medical Center
Legal name: Piedmont Eastside Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870982886
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Snellville, Georgia, USA
- Phone
- 770.979.0200
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $394,354,203
- Expenses
- $345,854,592
- Assets
- $277,126,641
- Liabilities
- $44,698,338
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MR LARRY EBERT (CEO & BOARD MEMBER)
Highest reported compensation
- MR THOMAS ARNOLD (TREASURER/CFO PHC): $1,518,663 total reported compensation
- MS ELIZABETH LEDDY (SECRETARY/CLO PHC): $1,379,286 total reported compensation
- DR CHARLES BROWN III (BOARD MEMBER): $1,356,906 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Piedmont eastside hospital, inc. Is a 305-bed facility located in the city of snellville in gwinnett county, Georgia. Over 800 primary care and specialty physicians of the medical staff meet the professional clinical needs of children, adults, and seniors within snellville and the greater metropolitan atlanta market, regardless of any indiviual's ability to pay for services. For the year ended june 30, 2025, the hospital had 14,042 in-patient admissions with a total of 70,763 days of in-patient hospitalization. Er visits totaled 63,792 and outpatient visits totaled 65,294. Surgical services were provided to 6,138 patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.1%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.2%; rating input score 79; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 76.1% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $300.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.5M · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.