Piedmont Division Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582096407
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Marietta, GA, USA
Phone
4044355684
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,716
Expenses
$0
Assets
$122,163
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gary Fish (Superintendent (President))

People named in this filing

  • Gary Fish (Superintendent (President))
  • Diana Watson (Director of Administration (Secretary))
  • Raymond Stewart (Director of Personnel)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Division is organized for the following purposes: To advance and promote the hobby of model railroading. To furnish a forum where model railroaders and railfans can meet and discuss, learn about, and exchange ideas on railroading and model railroading. To organize, sponsor, conduct, and participate in displays, conventions, shows, and other functions relating to the hobby of model railroading. To further the purposes of and to financially support the NMRA and the SER.

What it reported doing in 2025

Monthly meetings - attendance varies from 50 to 85. Each month except July and December there is an educational clinic on a model railroading subject, usually presented by a member, occasionally by a visitor. Also a "show and tell" with members bringing projects such as buildings, cars or engines to show their work and explain it to attendees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.3%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.