Pickaball Diverse Capitol Sports Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863005258
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
South Bend, IN, USA
Phone
5742982527
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Racquet Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,347
Expenses
$5,575
Assets
$20,142
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jennifer Reives (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Traci Williams (Board member)
  • Jennifer Reives (CEO)
  • Gregory Williams (Board member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to empower, educate, motivate and inspire individuals through racket and paddle sports by delivering opportunities for development, engagement and accessibility within diverse communities regardless of ability. This is a program for all to build family relationships, character, self-esteem and promote a healthy lifestyle. Educating and investing in the parents through our programs will give them the tools to decide if this is something that their child would be interested in doing at a recreational, high school or professional level. See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2025

We were able to provide services to over 300 youth participants and 81 adults. We have seen families continue to grow, mentally and physically. We have testimonies of people that are now losing weight and building their athletic confidence. Through our programs people are meeting new friends through more social interaction. We have been featured on the news and radio. We had a health and resource fair that was a success. we are continuing to grow and are gaining some followers to our mission. We were also able to give a scholarship to a well-deserved participant.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.6%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -28.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.61; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.6% of revenue deployed · 3.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $200 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.