PIBLY Residential Programs, Inc.

Legal name: Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133396313
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bronx, New York, United States
Phone
718-863-4100
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,038,273
Expenses
$32,598,490
Assets
$38,142,276
Liabilities
$32,230,595

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT FRANCO (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARTIN LALLI (Executive Dir.): $284,674 total reported compensation
  • EUGENE M GREGORY CPA (CFO): $231,575 total reported compensation
  • TONNIEANN NELSON (ASSESSMENT NURSE): $228,266 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

PIBLY's mission is to meet the needs of its consumers and help them achieve their goals of functioning independently within the community by providing residential housing and rehabilitation services and promoting consumer empowerment and a coordinated collaborative service delivery approach.

What it reported doing in 2024

Supported housing services: these programs provide permanent housing for adults with serious psychiatric illnesses. Most residents of these programs live alone in scattered site studio or one-bedroom bronx apartments but opportunities for shared units are available. These consumers have demonstrated the ability to live independently in the community with limited case management support services. Services are designed to provide stable housing and support to all consumers. The degree of support services is based on the individual needs of each person. Average length of stay for pibly's legacy scattered site supported housing exceeds 10 years. In 2015, pibly expanded to add the adult home supportive housing initiative to its supported housing portfolio and has since successfully placed and served over 150 consumers with the capacity to serve up to 234 in phase two of development. In july 2019, pibly was awarded 100 additional adult home supportive housing initiative beds in brooklyn. As a result, pibly now has offices and provides services in the bronx and brooklyn. In september 2019, pibly once again expanded the scattered site supported housing portfolio by adding 35 additional units under the New York state office of mental healths empire state supported housing initiative (esshi). All 35 esshi units are designated for homeless persons with serious mental illness in bronx county. By fye june 30, 2022, pibly successfully placed all 35 esshi consumers into their own supported apartment. In february 2023, pibly once again expanded the scattered site supported housing portfolio by adding 60 additional units under the New York state office of mental healths scattered site supportive housing for homeless adults proposal. All 60 bronx county units are designated for street homeless persons, some of whom are diagnosed with a serious mental illness. By fye june 30, 2024, pibly successfully placed 20 street homeless aka housing first consumers into their own supported apartment. Our legacy supported housing that serves up to 169 expanded to 204 after adding the 35 esshi-unit individuals, then to 264 after adding the housing first units. Excluding the new housing first units, our scattered site supported housing has operated at a 98% occupancy rate. In total, pibly is now contracted to operate 598 scattered site supported housing units throughout the bronx and brooklyn.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $29.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $285K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $567K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.