Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity Alpha Rho

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581446724
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
8594948879
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$162,390
Expenses
$153,379
Assets
$30,826

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZACH STAVA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ZACH STAVA (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER MASSI (INTERNAL VP)
  • ETHAN WEILAND (PHILANTHROPY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To operate the local chapter of pi kappa alpha fraternity, a college social fraternity, at the university of Ohio. Specifically, to promote the social, intellectual, and moral development of college and university men, both members and pledges of pi kappa alpha fraternity alpha rho chapter. Specifically, to promote the social, intellectual, and moral development of college and university men, both members and pledges of pi kappa alpha fraternity alpha rho chapter. Specifically, to promote the social, intellectual, and moral development of college and university men, both members and pledges of pi kappa alpha fraternity alpha rho chapter.

What it reported doing in 2018

To promote the social, intellectual, and moral development of members and pledges of pi kappa alpha fraternity alpha rho chapter

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 16
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.