Pi Beta Phi Fraternity North Dakota Alpha Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450284023
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Town Country, MO, USA
Phone
6362560680
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,990
Expenses
$47,392
Assets
$32,444
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MORGAN BLOOM (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • KIERA BECKER (VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNITY RELATIONS)
  • RYANNE CONDE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE/HOUSING)
  • RYLEE MILLER (VICE PRESIDENT MEMBER EXPERIENCE)
  • MADELINE HOYT (VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS)
  • JENNA GUERRIERI (VICE PRESIDENT RECRUITMENT)

People named in this filing

  • MORGAN BLOOM (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • KIERA BECKER (VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNITY RELATIONS)
  • RYANNE CONDE (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE/HOUSING)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To mutually encourage and assist members in social, mental, and moral advancement.

What it reported doing in 2024

The North Dakota alpha chapter of pi beta phi fraternity is a membership organization supported by dues, fees, charges, or other funds paid by its members and provides goods, facilities, and services to members while assisting students in improving various educational and leadership skills by supporting philanthropic and community service projects. During the current fiscal year, the chapter served approximately 17 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.7%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.