Pi Beta Phi Fraternity Alabama Beta Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630289647
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Town Country, MO, USA
Phone
6362560680
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,994,536
Expenses
$3,966,222
Assets
$1,058,310
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BROOKE MAYOR (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • AVERY GOODRICH (VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNITY RELATIONS)
  • MIA JANKOWIAK (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE/HOUSING)
  • REBECCA EDWARDS (VICE PRESIDENT MEMBER EXPERIENCE)
  • CHLOE HETLAND (VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS)
  • HANNA MODEL (VICE PRESIDENT RECRUITMENT)

People named in this filing

  • BROOKE MAYOR (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • AVERY GOODRICH (VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNITY RELATIONS)
  • MIA JANKOWIAK (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE/HOUSING)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To mutually encourage and assist members in social, mental, and moral advancement.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Alabama beta chapter of pi beta phi fraternity is a membership organizaiton supported by dues, fees, charges, or other funds paid by its members and provides goods, facilities, and services to members while assisting students in improving various educaitonal and leadserhip skills by supporting philanthropic and community service projects. During the current fiscal year, the chapter served approximately 503 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.