Physicians for Social Responsibility
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953956136
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2136899170
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arms Control, Peace
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,725,430
- Expenses
- $4,205,913
- Assets
- $5,792,797
- Liabilities
- $339,169
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT F DODGE MD (CO-PRESIDENT)
- YAZEED IBRAHIM (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARAL HASSANSHAHI (CO-PRESIDENT)
- MARTHA D ARGUELLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARTHA D ARGUELLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $205,674 total reported compensation
- DENISE DUFFIELD (ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR): $199,144 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Psr-la is a physician and health advocate membership organization working to protect public health from nuclear threats and environmental toxins.
What it reported doing in 2024
The year 2024 was a transformative period for physicians for social responsibility - los angeles (psr-la). The organization achieved significant victories a decade in the making while reaffirming its commitment to health, justice, and equity in response to the challenges presented by shifting national leadership.psr-la's strength lies in its multi-generational approach. By drawing on the diverse knowledge and experiences of staff, board members, community organizers, physicians, nurses, and health professionals, psr-la leverages collective wisdom to address pressing public health and environmental justice issues. This collaborative spirit extends to the board of directors, whose members share a common dedication to nuclear abolition, public health, and equity.throughout 2024, psr-la advanced its mission through major milestones, including:" securing the passage of sb 1137, prohibiting new oil wells within 3,200 feet of sensitive sites such as schools and homes." leading nuclear abolition efforts through the back from the brink campaign, with a strong presence at the alliance for nuclear accountability's dc days." supporting the energy justice team in helping to secure $521 million for the California energy commission's equitable building decarbonization program.recognizing a rapidly evolving political and environmental landscape, psr-la also embarked on a strategic planning process that culminated in a renewed mission and vision. These reaffirm the values upon which psr-la was founded, while positioning the organization to address future challenges at local, state, and national levels.psr-la remains steadfast in its role as a leader in defending democracy, advancing public health, abolishing nuclear weapons, and ensuring environmental justice. The organization's accomplishments in 2024 reinforce its ongoing commitment to shaping a healthier, safer, and more equitable future for the communities it serves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.4%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.4% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $206K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.