Physicians for Reform Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208048383
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Hickory, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8282569080
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $1,274
- Assets
- $66
- Liabilities
- $12,221
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLARE GRAY MD (P,CEO,DIRECT)
People named in this filing
- CLARE GRAY MD (P,CEO,DIRECT)
- BILL SHILLITO (VP,CFO,TREAS)
- PATSY GRAY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate physicians, patients, and the business community on the issues surrounding american health care. To support academic study and seminars to develop solutions for america's failing healthcare system. To underwrite educational materials and advertising to further the general public's understanding of the choices american healthcare faces.
What it reported doing in 2024
Disiminate information to the general public via direct mail, internet, press releases, articles, research papers, seminars, newsletters, monographs, and media appearances.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 43.5%; rating input score 43
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 185.17; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $554 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.