Physical Therapy Business Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274552652
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Corona, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9512737748
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,631
- Expenses
- $41,210
- Assets
- $7,021
- Liabilities
- $19,928
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES FELDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JEFFREY HATHAWAY (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES GLINN JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHARLES FELDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JEFFREY HATHAWAY (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES GLINN JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to improve the business conditions of the physical therapy profession and provide its constituents a platform to address practice and payment challenges and provide promotion and cost efficient opportunities in the profession of independent physical therapy practices.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provided constituents a platform to address practice and payment challenges in physical therapy businesses and promoted cost efficient opportunities for the profession and for independent physical therapy practices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.84; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.