Phs Ib Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923784756
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pensacola, FL, USA
Phone
8503323819
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,610
Expenses
$18,999
Assets
$12,611
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Chris McCullar (President)
  • Katherine Mitchem (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Chris McCullar (President)
  • Katherine Mitchem (Vice President)
  • Tina Ross (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized for the purpose of actively assisting and supporting the facult, students, and families of the Pensacol High School International Baccalaureate (IB) program. Ib Boosters will focus on providing essential financial support, communication and volunteer resources to strengthen the Pensacola High School IB program. The organization will create an inclusive, participatory, and welcoming environment to all Pensacola High School IB Parents, students and their families and will foster relationships between the Program and the community at large.

What it reported doing in 2023

We took the Junior class, 56 students, to a local historic site to learn about the homesteading and early american life in our region ($756.00). We took the sophmore class 37 students to the planetarium to learn about the seasonal star changes and atmospheric changes ($855.00) . The senior class 65 students had three events, they volunteered at a local elementary school reading to students, they presented their Extended Essay research papers to the community at an academic symposium, and they presented their Creativity Activity Service (CAS), 100 hr service projects to the community and talked about their findings ($1,314).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.7%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.7% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.