Phoenixville Free Clinic

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
233072363
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenixville, PA, USA
Phone
6109351134
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,640,996
Expenses
$2,631,449
Assets
$1,676,364
Liabilities
$417,291

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTI SEIDEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DONALD E PRICE PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DONALD E PRICE PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $96,587 total reported compensation
  • JACKI TULLY CRNP (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $82,607 total reported compensation
  • DR ANDREA PELLEGRINO (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $42,692 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide quality healthcare to the uninsured and underserved with dignity and respect.

What it reported doing in 2024

Phoenixville free clinic (pfc) is a nonprofit free clinic in phoenixville that provides medical care to uninsured residents of the greater phoenixville area, primarily in chester and montgomery counties. In our over 23 year history, we have provided nearly 200,000 patient visits to our most vulnerable neighbors. Without pfc's services, uninsured residents of our community would rely heavily on emergency services at local hospitals and go without preventative care, compounding medical issues and leading to chronic disease.during our 2024-25 fiscal year, we provided 1,386 unique patients with 4,745 patient visits. This includes both primary care visits and specialty care with our volunteer physicians in the fields of pediatrics, cardiology, allergy, neurology, podiatry, gastroenterology, gynecology, mental health counseling, orthopedics, pulmonology, dermatolgy, and more. Clinical laboratory tests are crucial to comprehensive care in both diagnosis and treatment. Pfc operates an in-house lab and also utilizes labcorp for tests we cannot process in-house, which our providers use to check organ function, monitor the progression of chronic disease, diagnose health issues, and develop treatment plans.pfc and paoli hospital continue our partnership to provide diagnostic tests such as x-rays, ultrasounds, mris, ct scans, mammograms, and other studies/consultations under the hospital's financial assistance care program. This year, pfc successfully expanded our behavioral health program which provides comprehensive individual behavioral health services. The central goal is to provide ongoing mental and behavioral services to the uninsured to promote overall wellness and prevent mental health crisis situations.description of the community served: the united way of Pennsylvania annual alice report highlights households that earn more than the federal poverty level but less than the basic cost of living for the area (the alice threshold). Created by the united way, alice, which stands for asset limited, income constrained but employed represents the growing number of families who are unable to afford the basics of housing, child care, food, transportation, healthcare, and technology. These workers often struggle to keep their own households from financial ruin, while keeping our local communities running. Since many patients delay medical care because of their inability to pay, patients seen by our providers often have multiple medical issues and require care from multiple specialists, in addition to primary care. This can present challenges with regard to the delivery of comprehensive care, and our ability to provide our patients with specialty care and ancillary services like lab testing and medications is critical. Our patients, in turn, face a multitude of challenges and those hardships were heightened during covid, when many lost their jobs and experienced increased financial strain and food and housing insecurity. Other barriers include mental health and addiction issues, lack of social and family support, and limited transportation. Pfc serves a diverse population. Over half of our patients are hispanic/latino and over half are women.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.