Phoenix Islands Protected Area Conservation Trust

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
986064893
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Bikenibeu Tarawa, KR
Phone
6172354830
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,716
Expenses
$201,083
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • LILY BRECHTEFELD KUMKEE (SECRETARY/EXEC. DIR.): $36,822 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing long-term sustainable financing for the conservation of terrestrial and marine biodiversity in the phoenix islands group which has resulted in: 1)one of the largest marine protected areas (mpa) in the pacific today and the largest mpa in the world created and supported by a least-developed nation2)covers 408,250 square kilometers, about the size of california3)largest marine unesco world heritage site4)first pacific island mpa to contain significant deep-sea habitat, includes all eight atolls and two submerged reef systems 5)atolls are home to globally important seabird populations

What it reported doing in 2022

The phoenix islands protected area (pipa) is a marine protected area (mpa) in kiribati, just five degrees south of the equator. Pipa is the world's first large, truly deep water mpa. As a vast expanse of largest pristine mid-ocean environments, pipa is truly an oceanic wilderness. Encompassing 408,250 square kilometers (157,626 square miles) and 11% of kiribati's exclusive economic zone (eez), pipa represents one of earth's last intact scenic coral archipelago ecosystems. The remoteness of the area and the absence of permanent human settlement provide a unique opportunity for a high standard of habitat protection for species and ecosystems of global importance to science and conservation, from islands to deep ocean.within its boundaries, it includes all eight atoll and low reef islands of the kiribati section of the phoenix island group: rawaki, enderbury, nikumaroro, mckean, manra, birnie, kanton and orona. It also includes two submerged reefs, carondelet reef and winslow reef, with carondelet reef being as little as 3 to 4 meters underwater at low tide. The coral reefs of the phoenix islands are what a reef might have looked like a thousand years ago before the presence of humankind's impacts, such as coastal development, pollution, and over fishing. The phoenix islands exhibit classic remote island and atoll characteristics, including steep reef drop-offs, relatively low species diversity and low endemicity, high fish abundance, harsh island habitats and vegetation, and large seabird nesting colonies. Recent research in the mpa has revealed the presence of "super corals," which may be genetically adapted to extreme sea temperature fluctuations and spawning grounds for several commercial important tuna species n the pacific.the majority of habitat in pipa is comprised of ocean floor with a water column averaging more than 4,000 meters (2.5 miles) deep with a maximum at 6,147 meters. It is estimated that there could be more than 30 seamounts within pipa though to date only nine have been named.because the deep sea is mostly unexplored, protecting it safeguards many species that have yet to be studied or even discovered. Pipa has only one settlement of about 25 people on kanton, made up of government employees and their families. Three of those residents are employees of pio in charge of implementing the management plan for kanton and the other atolls and resources in the phoenix island protected area. The other seven islands of the mpa are uninhabited. Pipa provides protection for terrestrial habitats on each of its islands safeguarding important nesting grounds for seabirds, several of which are threatened or endangered, and rare traditional plants that have cultural and medicinal values in kiribati, but are now threatened on more populated islands.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -49.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $181K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.