Phoenix Indian Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 866006566
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022646768
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,162,281
- Expenses
- $4,607,665
- Assets
- $6,231,052
- Liabilities
- $500,695
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANDRA D BENALLY (PRESIDENT)
- JOLYANA BEGAY-KROUPA (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOLYANA BEGAY-KROUPA (CEO): $125,000 total reported compensation
- MARK GRAHAM (CFO): $90,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As the oldest american indian center, we serve as the hub for the advancement of our urban american indian relatives with culturally relevant essential services, programs, and initiatives.
What it reported doing in 2023
Pic workforce development provided several services to the community including job readiness training with 302 attendees; job/training supportive services for 652 participants and team members provided individualized counseling meetings for 350 participants. Pic youth development program provided several services to high school age participants including job readiness training with 71 students; college/university virtual tours with 5 universities/colleges for 34 students from 12 different high schools; on-campus mentoring sessions at 3 high schools for 162 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $45.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.4% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.