Philly Girls in Motion
Legal name: Philly Girls in Motion Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272888491
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2022
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Media, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6103577446
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,455
- Expenses
- $1,375
- Assets
- $32,181
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- KATE SIBEL ESQ (BOARD MEMBER)
- AMY MINNITI (BOARD MEMBER)
- MIA HOLLINGSWORTH (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To give girls an opportunity to exercise and learn new sports in a safe, supportive environment with high quality, professional instruction.
What it reported doing in 2022
The organization's previous programming includes three program streams; after-school fitness & leadership, community sports clubs, and university clinics. The organization typically serves 700 girls annually, ages 6-14, from philadelphia and the surrounding areas. After school operated twice/weekly for the entire school year. Community sports clubs run weekly throughout the entire school year. However, due to the ongoing effects of the covid-19 crisis and related school/rec center closures, the organization's programs ceased operations in 2020, transitioned its only full time staff member in 2021, and initiated the dissolution process in late 2021 which continued through the entirety of 2022. Dissolution was approved in 2023, therefore there were no program related activities or expenses in 2022.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.4; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.