Philippine American Educational Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 529771107
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, RP
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,601,981
- Expenses
- $1,797,850
- Assets
- $9,780,576
- Liabilities
- $1,491,559
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- Jessica Simon (Chairperson and Public Affairs Officer American Embassy-Manila)
- Ryan Ingrassia (Treasurer and Cultural Affairs Officer American Embassy - Manila)
- Paul W Curry (Member and Principal Operations Coordinator Specialist Asian Development Bank)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Philippine-American Educational Foundation is a non-profit binational commission responsible for the administration of the prestigious Fulbright Scholarship Program Hubert H. Humprey Fellowships and other educational exchange initiatives. Grants are awarded on a competitive basis to Filipinos and American Students teachers scholars and professionals to study teach lecture and conduct research n the United States and in the Philippines.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational Exchanges and Scholarship in the US and and in the Philippines for Filipino and American students academics and professionals e.g. Fulbright Scholarship Fulbright-CHED Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Fulbright Distinguished Awards in teaching Program for International Teachers Program Global Undergraduate Exchange Program Fulbright Foreign Language Teaching Assistants Program etc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 85% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.1%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 66.3%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.1%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.44; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.1% of revenue deployed · 66.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.