Philadelphia Outward Bound School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562472884
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Philadelphia, PA, US
Phone
215.232.9130
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,509,052
Expenses
$3,613,892
Assets
$2,238,917
Liabilities
$406,716

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JUSTIN ENNIS (EXECUTIVE DI): $167,599 total reported compensation
  • JENNEL JOHNSON (DIRECTOR OF): $125,920 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To spark lifelong growth through challenge in the outdoors.

What it reported doing in 2025

Expedition programs are immersive, multi-day wilderness experiences that accelerate social-emotional skills related to courage, belonging, reflection, and physical engagement. Participants primarily come from a school's specific grade level, a leadership group, club, or affinity cohort. Expeditions range 5-14 days and take place along the appalachian trail in the Delaware water gap. Along with the rigors of camping, students engage in 2-3 physical challenges (hiking, canoeing, and rock climbing). Together, they navigate sharing team responsibilities: cooking, decision making, route planning, and problem-solving. Pobs also offers merit-based 100% scholarship summer expeditions open to youth throughout the region. These opportunities attract motivated students who previously participated previously in a one-day insight program or a school/group sponsored expedition. In 2025, 611 youth participated in a multi-day wilderness expedition; 418 of these students were surveyed post course to measure the impact of our programs. Combined with findings from students participating in insight days, the largest growth areas were group relationships, assertiveness, and social responsibility. Highlights from pobs' 2025 student surveys include: 92% are more aware of how to support others 87% feel more connected to their peers 89% gained confidence to try new things expeditions take three basic forms. 1). Peer leadership courses are 5-7 day wilderness courses that engage participants with peers in challenging environments to develop leadership and personal skills. They are either backpacking or canoeing expeditions in the fall or spring. Schools use these as part of a program progression for their 8th - 12th grade students who participated earlier in insight programs. These are also a popular format for summer open enrollment courses that attract students from all over who seek a challenge. 2) get out and lead (goal) is an annual 10-day merit-award summer expedition for philadelphia region twelve middle school students. The crew brings together motivated students selected from a variety of backgrounds for a mix of backpacking, canoeing and rock- climbing. Students must apply, provide references, and interview to be considered. 3) youth leadership corps is an annual 14-day merit-award summer expedition for high school students. Depending on funding, there can be one to two crews (12 students each). In 2025 there was one crew. This course also brings together motivated students selected from a variety of backgrounds for a mix of backpacking, canoeing and rock-climbing. Students must apply, provide references, and interview to be considered.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $168K · 26 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.