Philabundance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232290505
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
215-339-0900
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,254,448
Expenses
$105,470,803
Assets
$41,590,748
Liabilities
$8,744,119

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LOREE D JONES (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • LOREE D JONES (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $317,433 total reported compensation
  • DARRELL K GILES (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $224,199 total reported compensation
  • Dorothy Wong (CHIEF PARTNERSHIP OFFICER): $174,829 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Drive hunger from our communities today and to end hunger for good.

What it reported doing in 2024

To fulfill its mission to relieve hunger now, philabundance directly distributes food to more than 360 community partners and distributes additional food to another 300 agencies through other indirect partnerships, throughout a 9-county service area covering southeastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. Through collaboration with manufacturers, grocers, and local partners, philabundance is able to purchase, collect, and deliver upwards of 50,000,000 pounds of food annually to food pantries, soup kitchens, food cupboards, emergency shelters, and schoools, providing nutritious options to more than 135,000 people each week, including the region's most vulnerable groups including seniors and children. In addition, the organization activated over 5,600 volunteers who served more than 32,600 hours in the most recently completed fiscal year. Philabundance is committed to providing people with the food they want and need. To help accomplish this, philabundance launched the good food policy, which outlines our commitment to ensuring people have access to nutrious and culturally responsive food that is procured responsibly. This effort builds off our belief to put the people we serve at the center of what we do. With that in mind, philabundance is committeed to not only relieving hunger today but also ending hunger for good. This means we will focus on collaboratively pairing healthy food and other critical services to work toward long-term solutions to food insecurity. In addition, philabundance has a 16 week culinary vocational training program in north philadelphia (known as philabundance community kitchen) which has been transforming the lives of women and men with low-to-no income since 2000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 74% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $317K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 34 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 367 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 356 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.