Phila Coalition for Mental HealthMental Retardation Information and Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232616049
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2152386092
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,711
Expenses
$17,393
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH ANDL-PETKOV (PRESIDENT)
  • RAYMOND PESCATORE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID BOLIN (PRESIDENT)
  • ROSEMARY O'ROURKE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PAULA P SCHALLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH ANDL-PETKOV (PRESIDENT)
  • RAYMOND PESCATORE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID BOLIN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The philadelphia coalition for mental health/mental retardation information and education's primary exempt purpose is to promote the common good and general welfare of the people of philadelphia and elsewhere, by fostering the improvement of the quality of mental health/mental retardation services; by educating the general public, elected officials, and related organizations regarding mental health/ mental retardation issues; and improving the resources and information available to mental health/mental retardation professionals.

What it reported doing in 2013

Provide mental health/mental retardation education and advocacy to elected officials, the public, related organizations; and improve resources available to mental health/mental retardation professionals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -125.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -98.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.