Phi Kappa Sigma Building Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760700911
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bristow, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9183673333
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Sororities, Fraternities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,178
- Expenses
- $1,079
- Assets
- $102,642
- Liabilities
- $15,905
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN CALIENDO (President)
People named in this filing
- KEVIN CALIENDO (President)
- BLAKE THOMPSON (Director)
- BRENT MORGAN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objects of Phi Kappa Sigma Fraternity shall be the promotion ofgood fellowship and the cultivation of the social virtues among ourmembers; the protection of just rights and the advancement of thebest interests, present and future, individual and collective, of allthose who shall be associated together as members of this Fraternity; the encouragement of good scholarship and the breadth of training forour members; and cooperation in the educational and cultural programsof institutions of higher education in which our Chapters are located.
What it reported doing in 2024
Perpetuate the Omicron Chapter of Phi Kppa Sigma Fraternity at the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma; to supplement the student members' classroom experience and contribute to their personal development in the areas of education, morals, manners, culture and philosophy by providing them a safe, wholesome living environment and culture in which they can thrive. The fraternity attracts men of good character and scholastic and augments and fosters the education experience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.8%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 79.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 95.13; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -44.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 91.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.