Phelps Luck Alano Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521249935
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Columbia, MD, USA
Phone
4438641468
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,524
Expenses
$71,285
Assets
$47,679
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Alicia Reynolds (Co-Chairperson)
  • Rick Poppe (Co-Chairperson)
  • Ed Reimer (Facilities)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose Alcoholics Anonymous is to carry the message of recovery to suffering alcoholics. The Alano Club provides the facilities and infrastructure so that Alcoholics Anonymous groups can meet in a safe, clean environment to carry out the message. The Alano Club also provides a place for sober social activities. The building is open seven days a week, hosting over 30 Alcoholics Anonymous meetings each week. Attendance at meetings ranges from five to seventy people. All meetings are run by sober alcoholics who volunteer to serve six-month commitments.

What it reported doing in 2025

The primary purpose Alcoholics Anonymous is to carry the message of recovery to suffering alcoholics. The Alano Club provides the facilities and infrastructure so that Alcoholics Anonymous groups can meet in a safe, clean environment to carry out the message. The Alano Club also provides a place for sober social activities. The building is open seven days a week, hosting over 30 Alcoholics Anonymous meetings each week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.