Phame Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930991167
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039735815
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,330,720
- Expenses
- $1,290,420
- Assets
- $2,525,165
- Liabilities
- $500,359
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE MCNAIR (BOARD CHAIR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JENNY STADLER (PAST EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNY STADLER (PAST EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $65,237 total reported compensation
- ANYA ROBERTS-TONEY (COO): $62,067 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE MCNAIR (BOARD CHAIR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $28,912 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Phame is a fine and performing arts academy serving adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Offering four terms of arts-based classes each year, as well as a rigorous performance program, phame empowers students to learn new skills, take artistic risks, and build lasting relationships with people who share their experience of having a disability.phame is built upon the belief that art is for everyone, and that our community is stronger when it champions opportunities for all. With that in mind, phame brings passion, joy, and rigor to arts education and performance.
What it reported doing in 2024
Phame offered 100 term-length lifelong arts learning classes to 145 individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities from the portland metropolitan region and across the country. Classes included visual art, music, acting, dance, writing, and additional disciplines. We awarded $48,310 in tuition assistance to support participation in these classes and employed more than 25 teaching artists and campus coordinators.we continued to offer online and hybrid classes, with most classes held in person. In addition to term length classes, phame hosted both free and paid one day workshops on a variety of topics for phame students and for individuals served through partner organizations. Phame also supported students in building full and connected lives through campus events such as dances, cabarets, community gatherings, our annual get phameous open house, and our annual disability pride celebration, which was held in community vision's parking garage.in partnership with artists repertory theatre, two phame students consulted on the development of the production sapience, and one was cast in a leading role. As part of this partnership, phame provided coaching to art staff on supporting and accommodating individuals with i/dd. A cohort of phame students attended rehearsals and performances to learn about the production process, and chameleonica, phame's mixed ensemble, performed at a preshow event highlighting phame.phame also partnered with portland revels to develop revelation coffee, an original play written by phame students and performed by phame students alongside professional actors, with dramaturgy provided by an additional phame student. Auditions and rehearsals for phame performers were held at phame in the fall and winter. The production ran for three performances at the brunish theatre at portland'5.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.96; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.8% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $773K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.