Pgasla

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510185998
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
Phone
8162213485
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,976
Expenses
$119,501
Assets
$106,024

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anthony Malone (President)
  • Celine Armstrong (Past President)
  • Andy Buchwitz (President Elect)
  • Maria Londoni (Advocacy Vice President)
  • Avery Nichols (Membership Vice President)
  • Miranda Scott (Sponsonship/Education Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Anthony Malone (President)
  • Celine Armstrong (Past President)
  • Andy Buchwitz (President Elect)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Advancement of landscape architecture

What it reported doing in 2025

Awards - each year the organization honors the outstanding contributions to the practice of landscape architecture.Awards are given in the categories of Design (built), Design (unbuilt), Planning and Analysis, Research and Communications.Award competitions are separated into professional and student categories to recognize the achievement of both practitioners and students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 32.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.