Pga Tour

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
520999206
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9042853700
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$760,607,406
Expenses
$1,212,293,737
Assets
$3,863,253,473
Liabilities
$2,276,936,555

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Monahan Joseph W (Commissioner & President)
  • Baldwin Alexandra C (President Korn Ferry Tour)
  • Brady Jack M Jr (President PGA TOUR Champions)
  • Herlihy Edward D (Chairman / President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Woods Eldrick Tiger (Player Director): $29,327,975 total reported compensation
  • Monahan Joseph W (Commissioner & President): $19,227,851 total reported compensation
  • Spieth Jordan (Player Dir / Asst Secretary): $15,869,687 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The PGA TOUR's mission is to entertain and inspire through the game of golf, while maximizing charitable impact and delivering value to fans, players, and partners.

What it reported doing in 2024

The principal mission of pga tour, inc. Is the promotion of the sport of professional golf and the common interests of the touring professional golfer as well as growth of the game. This is primarily accomplished through managing and co-sponsoring professional golf tournaments, securing corporate sponsorship of tournaments and other programs, and securing television exposure for its professional golf tournaments. By managing and co-sponsoring four professional golf tournament divisions (pga tour, pga tour champions, korn ferry tour, and pga tour americas - collectively known as the pga tour), pga tour, inc. Provides opportunities for the touring professional golfer to compete and earn prize money and benefits while growing the game by exposing it to the general public through attendance and television and other media engagement. In 2024, the various tours collectively held 115 tournaments. Total prize money and other player-related benefits earned through competition by professional golfers across the various tours in 2024 exceeded $975 million. These tournaments were played in at least 35 u.s. States and 16 different countries in 2024, allowing people throughout the world the opportunity to experience first-hand the sport of professional golf. Members on the pga tour represent the world's best players, hailing from 28 countries and territories. Pga tour, inc. Secures television coverage for its tournaments through agreements with national and international broadcasters and cable channels. The pga tour has long-term domestic distribution partnerships for broadcast coverage on cbs, nbc, and golf channel and video streaming service on espn+. Internationally, pga tour coverage is available across 200+ countries and territories in 30 languages via 44 broadcast and digital partners. In addition to television coverage, the pga tour is embracing digital media across multiple platforms, including the pga tour app and a subsidiary's website, pgatour.com. To bring the players closer to the general public, volunteers, and sponsors, through a subsidiary the pga tour continues to grow its presence on social media channels, including youtube, facebook, instagram (in spanish, korean and japanese), linkedin, tiktok, x (in english, spanish and japanese); the pga tour channel on free ad-supported streaming television (fast) platforms such as the roku channel, samsung tv plus, plutotv, xumo, lg channels, tubi, amazon's freevee, firetv and alexa devices; and whatsapp (in english and spanish), wechat, weibo, toutiao, and douyin. Pga tour, inc. And the ladies professional golf association ("lpga") maintain a strategic alliance designed to further promote the growth of professional golf including areas such as schedule coordination, joint marketing, television representation, digital media, and the development of joint events including the annual grant thornton invitational. The pga tour and dp world tour continued its strategic alliance, with the tours exploring all facets of collaboration. This collaboration includes working in partnership on a number of areas including global scheduling and playing opportunities for the respective memberships. This includes the co-sanctioning of the genesis scottish open, to appear on both schedules, providing access to dp world tour members to two pga tour events, and granting pga tour membership to the top 10 dp world tour players from the previous year's race to dubai. The mission of growing the game of golf is enhanced through television, corporate sponsorships and the promotional activities associated with promoting the sport of professional golf. The qualified sponsorship payments received by pga tour, inc., as defined in internal revenue code section 513(i), promote the sport through funds utilized in part to increase purse amounts and earnings opportunities for professional golfers on the various professional golf tours collectively known as the pga tour and to achieve pga tour, inc.'s goal of giving back

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 75% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 71
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -59.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $29.3M · 33 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $223.8M reported
  • Consistency: 14 of 18 current checks pass · 4 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 353 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 361 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ForeignGrants column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.