Pfp Realty Holding Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133716925
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125921804
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,122,195
- Expenses
- $17,958
- Assets
- $230,038
- Liabilities
- $24,974
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To hold title in a real estate partnership for its tax-exempt parent.
What it reported doing in 2011
Organization has received investment income from the real estate partnership in which it holds title.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.81; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4,346%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 189.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -160.1% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 5 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.