Pfood Pfairness in Pflugerville Schools
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923851391
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Pflugerville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5127370114
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,090
- Expenses
- $67,281
- Assets
- $70,950
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COREY ANN AMADOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MAXX AMADOR (PRESIDENT)
- ISRAEL ANDRADE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN AMADOR (DIRECTOR)
- COREY ANN AMADOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MAXX AMADOR (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charitable: Our goal at Pfood Pfairness in Pflugerville Schools is to ensure every student has access to hot, nourishing meals without worrying about debt or embarrassment. No child should ever have to choose between hunger and humiliation. As a student-founded, student-led 501(c)(3) nonprofit fighting food insecurity and inequity in our school district, our goal is to provide families with the necessary funds to reduce the financial burden of the students' lunch costs, ensuring all students have equal access to equitable meals and keeping families out of collections.
What it reported doing in 2025
Pfood Pfairness funded lunch accounts for Pflugerville ISD students to cover the cost of hot meals, ensuring they did not receive the alternative cold, cheese sandwich the district serves if money is owed. At the beginning of 2025, to qualify for free lunch, the household monthly income limit was $3,483 for a family of four. The limit includes everyone in the household, including a teenager who works, and it is the same in every state, not taking into consideration cost of living differences. Students helped are in financial need but do not receive the assistance they need from the free and reduced lunch program, usually because of a household income just out of qualifying range. Accounts were funded at least every two weeks, helping an average of 432 students each time. Some families reach out to us directly for debt assistance and others are brought to our attention by the school district with identifying student information redacted due to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. Because we are blind to all information except campus attended and debt amount, we cannot differentiate families receiving repeated help from those who only receive it once. Throughout 2025, a total of $20,649.74 was added for students across 6,271 account credits on 18 different funding days from January to May and then again from August through December. Though it's possible each account credit ensured hot lunches for different students, a more feasible estimate is that 700-800 were provided funds for meals. Over this time, funding for 34,100 hot meals was provided for students across 27 campuses--11,899 lunches at the high school level, 4,281 in middle school, and 14,740 at the elementary level. Prior to Pfood Pfairness' intervention, these students were either receiving a cold cheese sandwich for lunch and suffering the humiliation of having their entree replaced in front of their peers, or they were avoiding lunch completely, preferring hunger over embarrassment. Many of these students come from low-income families and are considered at risk, and some are even athletes trying to make the entire school day and after school practice or a game with just the free breakfast to sustain them. Providing these children with a hot meal and the nourishment they need to be successful in school, academically and otherwise, while also sparing them the social consequences of receiving the alternative lunch, is Pfood Pfairness' primary mission. Because funding to provide debt relief and funding to provide future meals for students happen concurrently, there is no way to allocate program service expenses to them individually. Subsequently, program service expenses for lunch funding assistance are estimated and were calculated by using the ratio of money used to ensure hot meals to total grants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.5%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -45.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.5% of revenue deployed · 2.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.