Pflag
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953750694
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2024678180
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,258,727
- Expenses
- $6,636,934
- Assets
- $5,490,924
- Liabilities
- $874,811
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN BOND (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- AARON RIDINGS (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN BOND (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $300,132 total reported compensation
- AARON RIDINGS (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $186,803 total reported compensation
- JAMIE CURTIS (VP, CHAPTER & COMMUNITIES ENG): $178,227 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create a caring, just, and affirming world for lgbtq+ people and those who love them, and envisions an equitable, inclusive world where every lgbtq+ person is safe, celebrated, empowered, and loved.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chapter network the pflag chapter network program objectives are realized through three pillars of work: support, education, and advocacy. Pflag national provides support to the chapter network through the following initiatives: learning opportunities, leadership and partnership support, critical resources, and technical assistance to pflag volunteer leaders. Assisting communities in forming new chapters and working with chapter leaders to continue to expand and enrich mission activities in communities all over the country. Fostering networking across states and regions, providing newsletters which inform members about pflag and public issues and publishing a wide variety of resources for its chapter education programs. Coordinates special events and community programs to educate the general public about its mission, offers opportunities for public engagement at the local and national levels, and provides a safe, virtual, moderated space where lgbtq+ people and family members with shared experiences can connect. Pflag national provides education opportunities to the public, the chapter network, philanthropic corporate partners, and pflag national members and supporters. Pflag's education programs include workplace engagement and education, an online academy providing free, monthly virtual learning sessions, and a variety of publications in both english and spanish to educate people about sexual orientation, gender identity, and relevant issues. Through its partnerships, digital media, resources and visibility strategies, pflag provides advocacy opportunities to the public, the chapter network, and pflag national members and supporters. The united voice of lgbtq+ people, parents and families, and non-family allies is vitally needed to advance inclusion, equity, and justice socially and legislatively pflag national coordinates public appearances and presentations by national leadership to educate targeted audiences and the public about families with lgbtq+ loved ones. Through traditional and new media, pflag national provides critical messaging, tools and resources related to family acceptance, community education and the importance of the ally voice. Pflag national maintains a strong presence in Washington, d.c., to advocate with congress, the white house and federal agencies to ensure laws and regulations reflect the concerns of pflag's community. Coalition work and support of chapters is also a part of pflag's activities to create a stronger and more unified statewide pflag presence to support families, educate allies, and advocate for legislative change. Among the many advocacy issues are voting rights, nondiscrimination protections for lgbtq+ people, safer schools, sustaining marriage equality, reducing hate crimes, classroom censorship, access to medically necessary care for transgender people and those seeking reproductive healthcare, transgender inclusion in all aspects of life, and more. Pflag works with national partners to share stories through written and public testimony as well as submission of amicus briefs on behalf of its membership. Pflag also engages in litigation when requested and appropriate. This includes cases at the state and federal level.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 45.4%; rating input score 45; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $300K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $923K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.