Petersburg Mental Health Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920151413
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Petersburg, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9077723332
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $162,935
- Expenses
- $301,029
- Assets
- $3,243,950
- Liabilities
- $6,300
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN OHMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN OHMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $41,900 total reported compensation
- KATHY R O'REAR (FINANCE OFFICER): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To increase and improve the available locally-based behavioral health options for residents of petersburg, the remainder of mitkof island and the city of kupreanof. To effectively address the mental health and substance abuse needs of each consumer regardless of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, age, gender, sexual preference, and mental or physical handicap. To maintain a primary focus on the confidentiality of our clients "in this small town environment". To do "whatever works" to increase the interpersonal, emotional, behavioral and intellectual skills that allow our consumers to function in the community at the highest possible level of independence. "whatever works" refers to a comprehensive range of services, including some traditional psychotherapy (group, individual, couples, family), chemical dependency counseling, and monetary support services and advocacy for other community-based non-profits.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided mental health and substance abuse services and options to residents of petersburg, Alaska in general, and other surrounding areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -84.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.78; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $240K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.