Peter and Lucy Chang Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880545946
IRS 990-PF coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
The Hills, TX, USA
Phone
8177097488
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$171

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Student Services, Organizations of Students

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 4 grants totaling $0. The stated grant purposes included girlstarts mission is to empower girls through stem. we envision a future where all who identify as girls believe they can change their world through stem. we are a national women-led organization offering year-round out-of-school stem science technology engineering and math programming for girls in grades 4-8 in texas california massachusetts and other locations across the country., as an education innovation nonprofit code.org is dedicated to ensuring that every student in every school has the opportunity to learn computer science as part of their core k-12 education. they focus on expanding access to computer science with a special emphasis on increasing participation by young women and students from other underrepresented groups. their work includes providing k-12 computer science curriculum in large school districts organizing the annual hour of code campaign and inspiring millions of students worldwide to engage with computer science., and youngarts identifies exceptional young artists amplifies their potential and invests in their lifelong creative freedom., plus 1 other reported purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no charitable disbursements for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of available resources goes to charitable grants and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 0
  • Cost Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: At most 0% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: Filed investments detail
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Grant Deployment: Grant deployment ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 0/100.