Petaluma Wrestling Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932673388
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Petaluma, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7074808795
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,018
- Expenses
- $53,318
- Assets
- $53,893
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AUSTIN WEHE (President)
- ABBY LUCHA (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- AUSTIN WEHE (President)
- ABBY LUCHA (Vice President)
- BEN PEARCE (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancement of education by fostering local, national and/or international amatuer sports competition. Petaluma wrestling club activities and sessions are intended to reverse community detrioration and juvenile delinquency by hosting and facilitating youth sports activities in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
PETALUMA WRESTLING CLUB IS COMMITTED TO THE CHARACTER DEVELOPEMENT OF YOUNG PEOPLE THROUGH THE SPORT OF WRESTLING. PWC IS A COHESIVE COMMUNITY WITH VOLUNTEER COACHES, SUPPORTIVE PARENTS/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT.GOALS: 1. Instruct in proper fundamentals and safe wrestling techniques. 2. Help develop a strong competitive spirit while fostering and maintaining the highest levels of good sportsmanship. 3. Promote and develop a strong team concept. 4. Promote the values of hard work, ethical competition, friendship, respect for team and opponents and high academic standards. 5. Compete in various local, regional, state and national competitions as the coaches deem appropriate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 107.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 49.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.