Petaluma High School Ag Dpt Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452595912
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Petaluma, CA, USA
Phone
7079539529
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$139,830
Expenses
$112,476
Assets
$242,886

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL BORDESSA (President)
  • ANTOINETTE H BROOKS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL BORDESSA (President)
  • ANTOINETTE H BROOKS (Vice President)
  • CINDY BORDESSA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the welfare of the individual and collective members of the petaluma high school agriculture department by cooperating with, supplement and augment the services of the director(s) of the phs agriculture department.to assist in providing funds for activites or equipment outside the scope of the phs school district. To chaperone, sponsor, or otherwise participate in activities which promote the interests of the phs agriculture department.the phs ag boosters also encourages youth participation in agriculture department activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The petaluma high school agriculture department boosters has been able to provide two scholarships, in the amount of $1,000 each to qualified students that show promise in achieving an agricultural career goal. The department plans on continuing this sponsorship of $2,000 ($1,000 each) to two students in the years to come.the department also plans on contributing available resources to the ag classroom and shop for equipment, tools, software and shop supplies needed to carry on beyond the scope of the petaluma high school district.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 6.8%; rating input score 7
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.16; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 6.8% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.