Pet Pride of New York Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161121426
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Mendon, NY, USA
Phone
5857421630
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$810,916
Expenses
$583,487
Assets
$4,844,469
Liabilities
$30,267

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR STUART GLUCKMAN DVM (PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN)
  • POLLY GRUNFELD SACK ESQ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DR STUART GLUCKMAN DVM (PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN)
  • DAWN HAMPSEY CPA MST (TREASURER)
  • REBECCA LOHNES CDBC CCBC (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pet pride of New York has been saving homeless cats and matching them with caring adopters since 1977. We operate a no-kill cat sanctuary and adoption center with an on-site veterinary medical center where we shelter and care for cats and kittens who are stray, abandoned, orphaned, or surrendered.

What it reported doing in 2024

Adoption programpet pride has been matching homeless cats with loving adopters since 1977. The pet pride cat sanctuary and adoption center is open to the public, and we have designated spaces for prospective adopters to observe and interact with adoptable cats. Trained staff and volunteers screen and interview prospective adopters, make suitable matches with adoptable cats, and follow up after placement to help ensure success. They provide advice and guidance to keep cats in their homes when appropriate and welcome any pet pride cat back into our shelter at any time if that is the better option. We strive to ensure that no pet pride cat is ever homeless again.foster program pet pride maintains a network of volunteer foster providers who enable us to extend our lifesaving reach beyond the walls of our shelter and increase our capacity for care. Orphaned and newborn kittens with their fragile immune systems, pregnant and nursing mom cats who need a quiet space, and cats who are not thriving in the shelter or who need additional socialization are cared for in private homes. A pet pride staff member screens and supervises all foster providers, and pet pride provides all veterinary care, food, supplies, and ongoing support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $165.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.3; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $487K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.