Pet Awareness and Welfare Society for San Jose Animal Care & Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202936623
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Campbell, CA, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,306
Expenses
$8,573
Assets
$41,087

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANICE FRAZIER (President)

People named in this filing

  • RANDEE MCQUEEN (Secretary)
  • PEGGY RUSHER (Treasurer)
  • BEV ANDALORA (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support & work with the san jose animal care&services to reduce the number of homeless animals & increase awareness of the value of companion pets in the home & community.

What it reported doing in 2024

We have raised funds through donations, fundraisors, holiday pictures which have been used to pay medical bills for shelter cats and dogs. We have altered 180 dogs & cats. We started a mommy/kitten program where we supplied food and supplies for kittens under 8 weeks. We have created a rescue clinic for cats, dogs, birds & rabbits which has lowered the euthanizing. We have assissted low-income familes by making available meds and aninmal welfare. We created a vacine clinic twice a month to vacinate at lower costs. We have hired behavorists so animals would be more likely to get adopted. Purchased equipment for san jose animal shelter. Paid for continuing education for shelter staff. Our website is current and up to date which has increased partnerships with other shelters.our medical funds are aiding in the decrease of euthanizing animals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.7%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.79; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.7% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.