Perry Memorial Library Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 560731953
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Henderson, NC, USA
- Phone
- 2524383316
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $933,798
- Expenses
- $839,620
- Assets
- $674,075
- Liabilities
- $134,591
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATTI MCANALLY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA)
Highest reported compensation
- PATTI MCANALLY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA): $68,134 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A public library providing learning and educational activities to the vance county area.
What it reported doing in 2020
This corporation was organized as a nonprofit organization to operate a public library for the benefit of the citizens of henderson and vance county, North Carolina, with funds obtained through contributions, gifts and governmental grants. Local government grants for operations totaled $821,394 and state aid grants were $102,821. Of these monies $551,336 was used for program services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59% of revenue deployed · 65.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $551K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.