Permian Basin Behavioral Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874691648
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Midland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4322211569
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Mental Health Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,821,844
- Expenses
- $5,318,497
- Assets
- $105,537,259
- Liabilities
- $7,586,734
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUSSELL MEYERS (PRESIDENT)
- RUSSELL TIPPIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATT COLLINS (BOARD MEMBER)
- MARCY MADRID (BOARD MEMBER)
- STEVE STEEN (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pbbhc's mission is to provide high-quality behavioral health services that are accessible to all residents of permian basin region of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico.
What it reported doing in 2024
The pbbhc is a culmination of several years of efforts to raise awareness of behavioral health concerns, remove the stigma associated with mental health treatment and build support among key stakeholders for a complete solution to the region's mental health needs.the pbbhc exists to create a comprehensive behavioral health center to provide services for residents of the permian basin. The permian basin region includes a total of 17 west Texas counties, with a total population of over 500,000. The center will include inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care for adults and adolescents, along with a crisis stabilization unit and counseling and therapeutic spaces appropriate for all ages. It is the goal of the pbbhcto provide a continuum of care for mental health services for residents of the permian basis, along with support for their families and the community as a whole.to accomplish this objective, the ector county hospital district and the midland county hospital district joined together to collectively plan the objectives and purpose. During this planning phase, the pbbhc was formed, a plan of action was created and a project budget was developed. The cornerstone of this project is the state of the art facility itself that will attract qualified healthcare professionals to a traditionally difficult to recruit area.the facility will be a thoughtfully designed comprehensive behavior health center in a location central to midland and odessa and its residents.the estimated costs associated with the construction of this facility is in excess of $80m. Recognizing the need for such a facility and supporting the objective of pbbhc, the Texas legislature approved a bill to allocate $40m of funds received by Texas under the american rescue plan act of 2021 toward the construction of the facility. It is anticipated that the balance of the funds needed will be raised through private donations to the pbbhc and/or mchd and echd's private foundations. During fy2025 the facility was still in construction phase; most expenses are to be capitalized as part of overall consturction until operations began in may 26, 2026.the pbbhc will be a resource to the entire region with its principal purpose to promote a holistic approach to mental well-being and provide appropriate medical care to the residents of the permian basin.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.84; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 87.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.