Perfect Pair

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853712412
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Farmington Hills, MI, USA
Phone
2489105714
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,068
Expenses
$47,965
Assets
$77,067

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • EMILY LERNER (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • LAURA MILLER (PROGRAM DIRE)
  • LIZZY REUPPEL (VICE EXEC DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Perfect pair is a program that creates one-on-one connections between seniors in assisted living communities and college students. Senior-student pairs are made based on mutual background and interests, and foster meaningful connections through both conversation and programming in the areas of art, literature, culture, gardening, physical activity, cooking, special events and holidays, and many other areas.

What it reported doing in 2024

Perfect pair is a program that creates one-on-one connections between in assisted living communities and college students. Senior- student pairs are made on mutual background and interests, and foster meaningful connections through both conversation and programming in the areas of art, literature, culture, and more. Our goal is to increase connection and re-engage seniors living in assisted livign with their diverse goals, interest, and passions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 51.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 51% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 54.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.