Pera Lee Branch Inc C/o L&b Realty Advisors Llp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260339650
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2149890800
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,366
- Expenses
- $17,199
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACIE CROWN (PRESIDENT)
- PETER A BENYO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMY MCGARRITY (SOLE DIRECTOR)
- STACIE CROWN (PRESIDENT)
- PETER A BENYO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pera lee branch, inc., is a 501(c)(25) organization. It was organized for the exclusive purpose of acquiring real property, holding title to and collecting income from such property, and remitting the entire amount of the income from such property (less expenses) to the shareholder of this corporation. The sole shareholder of this corporation is the public employees' retirement association of Colorado, which is a tax-exempt pension fund that meets the requirements of section 414(d). All distributions were paid to the public employees' retirement association of Colorado. This shareholder received the net income of pera lee branch, inc.
What it reported doing in 2022
The entity operated the real estate property for its exempt beneficiary, the public employees' retirement association of Colorado (EIN: 84-6000472). The entity sold the property in january 2020.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -626.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -105.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 26 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.