Peoria Cheerz Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270810811
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Trinity, FL, USA
- Phone
- 6232524337
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,437
- Expenses
- $91,111
- Assets
- $22,984
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rebecca Lehman (President)
People named in this filing
- Rebecca Lehman (President)
- Joshua Lehman (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was formed to provide youth the opportunity to learn how to cheer and dance. Peoria Cheerz strives to create an atmosphere where everyone is welcome to experience the joy of being part of a team. The organization provides quality lessons and services at a discounted rate for youth and high school students. Scholarships and assistance is offered to families who would otherwise not be able to participate in cheerleading and dance at a regular cheer gym.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provide cheer and dance lessons for youth at multiple locations in the Greater Phoenix Metropolitan area. Work with teams to provide excellent coaching and choreography for cheer competitions. Teach tumbling and stunts to teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.