People4utah Take Action

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923991530
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8016381494
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$9
Expenses
$2,254
Assets
$933

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BRYSON GARBETT (Director)
  • JOHN HOLLAND (Director)
  • JAN GARBETT (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At people4utah take action, our mission is to help utahns activate the political power granted to them in our state constitution. We amplify what we hear from individuals by sharing it on social media, newsletters and our website.

What it reported doing in 2024

We hosted events that brought together individual citizens and existing nonprofit organizations to strengthen their desire for a more inclusive and representative democracy.we provide the tools and support needed for individuals to gain confidence to engage their elected officials on multiple levels, to have their voice hear in decision-making processes. We offered this program with a variety of options for different levels of interest.our programs are meant to strengthen the power of the individual to be more successful in the existing political and civic systems. Empowering individuals is key, but it's not enough. We also conducted research and advocacy to reduce roadblocks in the existing system that may be preventing individuals from exercising their power.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24,944.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -167.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -199.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -109.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.