People's Place Ii Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510113062
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Milford, DE, USA
Phone
3024228033
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,956,419
Expenses
$7,947,869
Assets
$6,047,122
Liabilities
$708,910

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LARRY LINAWEAVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FAYE WHEELER (PRESIDENT)
  • MAMIE CHAREST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BERJEES MUKHTAR (COUNSELING CENTER DOCTOR): $284,427 total reported compensation
  • JAN NIEVES (COUNSELING CENTER DOCTOR): $162,755 total reported compensation
  • MAMIE CHAREST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $116,149 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

People's place ii, inc. Is dedicated to becoming the agency of choice to help people find their path to growth and independence. To this end, people's place ii, inc. Identifies the social and mental health needs of Delaware residents and facilitates the provision of services to address those needs. People's place ii, inc. Assists people of various communities by providing high-quality services that promote dignity, empowerment, independence, safety, self-esteem, and self-sufficiency.

What it reported doing in 2024

Safe (shelter, advocacy, freedom, and empowerment) operates a domestic violence program that includes two shelters in kent and sussex counties for domestic violence victims/survivors and their children. Shelters offer emergency, short-term housing with staff support around the clock. The program operates a 24/7 hotline for victims. Multiple needs of victims and their children including safety and well-being and advocacy addressed. Staff utilize trauma-informed practice and assist with safety-planning, support with restraining orders, victim compensation applications and referrals to community resources such as housing assistance, healthcare and counseling are offered. Hotel stays are facilitated for victims/survivors of family violence and domestic violence in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $284K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.