People's Community Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800716363
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3232552900
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,290
- Expenses
- $3,585
- Assets
- $81,294
- Liabilities
- $170,324
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARAM MANOUKIAN (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ALVINA MARANDIAN (BOARD MEMBER)
- EILEEN MERLE (BOARD MEMBER)
- ELISA ESCAMILLA (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
People's community clinic is a not for profit community based health care provider, committed to providing our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care. The organization respects all individuals with courtesy and dignity.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization has contracts from governmental agencies in order to operate it's community clinic. The organization provides comprehensive services in family planning, immunications, women's health, pediatric healthcare, internal medicine and family practice. The organization emphasizes the opportunity for underinsured and uninsured people in los angeles county, riverside, and san bernardino to receive free and affordable healthcare.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.3%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.4%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.68; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.1; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -54.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.3% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.