People's Burn Foundation of Indiana

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352018477
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3178032876
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Safety Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,209
Expenses
$125,464
Assets
$16,444
Liabilities
$37,400

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATT GODBOUT (PRESIDENT)
  • VICKI MORR (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MATT GODBOUT (PRESIDENT)
  • VICKI MORR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER ROSS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the people's burn foundation is to provide support and advocacy services to burn survivors and their familiies and to educate our youth and communities on burn safety and prevention.

What it reported doing in 2015

Camp saturday - a week long residential camp specifically designed for children ages 5 to 18 who have survived burn injuries. Burn survivors contend with many difficult psychological, physical and emotional issues such as peer acceptance as well as self-acceptance. By providing a safe and nurturing environment we give our campers a place to share their feelings and experiences with other children who have endured the same kind of injury as well as our licensed child and family therapist. Camp saturday is a year long program with therapeutic activities throughout the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.27; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -33.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -44.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.