People of Westview

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920486138
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,882
Expenses
$14,224
Assets
$29,380

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stefanie Rugaard (POW President)

People named in this filing

  • Bevan Koah (Acting Manager)
  • Stefanie Rugaard (POW President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

All parents of the Westview School are members of People of Westview POW. There is no membership fee. POW provides support for the school throughout the year. They are an active part of The Westview School and assist in many ways to support the mission of the school. Families are encouraged to participate in POW by attending meetings and social events and volunteering as their skills and opportunity allow. Parents are also given the opportunity to volunteer on many POW committees including membership supplies hospitality teacher appreciation yearbook Family Fun Day and more. POW raises funds through events throughout the year to give back to the students and teachers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Family Fun Day- POW hosts a sensory friendly carnival every year for our students with autism and their families to come enjoy bounce houses carnival games rock walls etc. We spend around $4,000 to put on the event for our families and students. We hold an online auction for families to bid and purchase tickets to fund that event. Extra funds are put towards Teacher Appreciation week and usually a project to help benefit the students or faculty.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 54% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.