Pennsylvanias Education for All Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562494545
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,713
- Expenses
- $3,243
- Assets
- $6,108
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Linda Carmona-Bell (President)
- Marianne Infante (Acting Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Linda Carmona-Bell (President)
- William Paz De Melo (Board Member)
- Dominic DeFino (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Offer information and training to families of individuals with disabilities educators and interested parties on meaningful successful inclusive education. We do this through working one-on-one with families guest speaking at universities and colleges offering updated resources and information at an annual conference and pairing with experts in the field with family members to review their loved ones individual education program.
What it reported doing in 2024
PEACs 20th Anniversary Celebration and 11th Conference was held in October 2024. We offered a spectrum of information that was segmented into breakout rooms for families with infants to age 5 school ages 5 to 12 high school 13 to 22 and transition age beyond high school 13 to 26. We celebrated our 20th anniversary with dinner and entertainment by two talented individuals with disabilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.88; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.