Pennsylvania State Association Of County Unionville Community Fair Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232197987
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Unionville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6103472087
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,385
- Expenses
- $84,553
- Assets
- $99,462
- Liabilities
- $-275
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDSEY TOWNSEND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUE WHITE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- APRIL MCGRATH (BOARD MEMBER)
- BARRY CASH (BOARD MEMBER)
- BONNIE MUSSER (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission to provide the community with wholesome family entertainment and educational opportunities and programs. To promote the hands on experience of the farm through the opportunities offered at the annual community fair. To insure the continuing support and education of the community in all aspects of farming life.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization holds an annual community fair to provide activities and displays that inform and involve children and adults in a stimulating and hands on environment to educate, challenge, reward, and entertain in the fields of agriculture, livestock, handicrafts and art. Approximately 10,000 people are served during the five day period. The community event is operated by over 300 volunteers, including 65 exhibit directors and 100 judges that staff the 200 plus exhibits. Volunteers include high school, middle school and elementary school students, boy scouts, fire companies, farming clubs, livestock, dairy & equestrian organizations, agricultural 4-h & ffa programs, local ymca, historic societies, environment agencies and technical college students. New this year hay rides, 5k walk run, and a beer & wine garden.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $46.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.