Pennsylvania Society of Anesthesiologists Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 256068908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- West Chester, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8337701550
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $555,536
- Expenses
- $471,518
- Assets
- $3,607,618
- Liabilities
- $144,436
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW BORYAN MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- ADAM CHILDERS MD (PRESIDENT)
- ALAN MARCO MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JENNIFER RAY BECKMAN MBA CAE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER RAY BECKMAN MBA CAE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $128,150 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Pennsylvania society of anesthesiologists is to stimulate interest and encourage progress in the specialty of anesthesiology. The psa works to achieve these goals with annual scientific meetings, philanthropic endeavors with communities across the commonwealth and advocacy for the profession of anesthesiology. Numerous psa board members attend federal legislative events in Washington dc, meeting with legislators. Psa continues to engage with Pennsylvania legislators to support development of anesthesia assistant programs and to strongly oppose continuing legislation regarding certified nurse anesthetists' ability to work unsupervised. The psa feels strongly this would compromise patient safety.
What it reported doing in 2025
The society encourages research and scientific progress in anesthesiology; and provides a newsletter, disseminates educational information to the profession and the public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.65; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 31 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $128K reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.