Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251643651
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wilkinsburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4122437535
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,437,466
- Expenses
- $6,275,047
- Assets
- $20,992,557
- Liabilities
- $1,185,738
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMBER BATTAGLIA (PRESIDENT)
- PAULA DAVIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ROSA VERDIGLIONE DAVIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- ROSA VERDIGLIONE DAVIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $193,131 total reported compensation
- SAMANTHA DYE (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $137,256 total reported compensation
- LESLIE SLAGEL (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $128,477 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. We provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and alcohol treatment and support services, all designed to reflect and respect the lives of women.
What it reported doing in 2024
Like all of the organization's treatment programs, power house is gender-responsive, co-occurring disorder capable and trauma-informed. Power house is the organization's first program and served approximately 75 women this past year. This 26-bed residential treatment facility, which opened in 1991, is licensed as a non-hospital inpatient/halfway house treatment program by the Pennsylvania department of drug and alcohol programs (ddap). Halfway house programs provide residential treatment in a home-like setting with a focus on reconnecting to the community. Most women come to power house after completing a rehab program so they can continue their treatment in a safe environment while beginning the process of transitioning to the community. At power, our therapists provide individual and group therapy and help address clients' clinical needs, our health and wellness coordinator address any medical and physical health needs and our resource coordinator begins working with clients to identify safe and affordable housing and connect them to workforce development programs and other health and human services. Our staff help women re-establish relationships with their children and families, help them explore employment and educational opportunities, and make sure they leave our services with a personally tailored aftercare and discharge plan that sets them up for success. Women can stay at power house for as long as is needed to accomplish their treatment goals and secure safe housing along with a plan for follow up outpatient care. Power contracts a psychiatrist who provides psychiatric assessment as needed, medication management, and consultation to clients and staff. Staff work with clients to teach them life skills and increase their knowledge of relapse prevention strategies. Power's goal is to help women build a strong foundation in recovery that will help them achieve long-term health and wellness. Specific services include: biopsychosocial evaluation, treatment planning, individual and group therapy, family counseling sessions, psychoeducational trauma services using a trauma-specific curriculum; psychiatric services, medication management, psychoeducation classes, health and wellness, case management, leisure activities, life skills development, and aftercare/discharge planning
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.4%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.5%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.35; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.4% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $193K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.