Pennsylvania Mountains Healthcare Alliance ASO-PA Mtns Hlthcare Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251886313
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dubois, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8143722355
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Associations (Non-Government)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,027,355
- Expenses
- $96,027,355
- Assets
- $17,849,514
- Liabilities
- $17,849,514
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOE GRIBIK (Executive Dir.)
- TERRI LACEY WMCHC (Director)
- NATHAN STOLITZA ARMSTRONG (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Maintain and administer the self-insured employee welfare benefit plans of its member hospitals to achieve a cost savings benefit.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the exempt organization is to provide member hospitals with insurance and services needed for maintaining and administering their respective self-insured welfare benefit plans, which plans have been established and maintained by each such employer to provide health and dental benefits for the employees of the employer and families of such employees. The insurance and such services may include, but not be limited to: a. specific and/or aggregate stop loss insurance provided under any policy or policies issued to the Trustee andb. certain claim services, cost analysis and other services under any Administrative Service Agreement entered into by the Trust Administrator and an entity qualified to furnish such services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes related organizations
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.