Pennsylvania Harm Reduction Coalition C/o Cheshire Law Group
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832845467
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2673314157
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $77,333
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER CERA (PRESIDENT, D)
People named in this filing
- ERIN RUSSELL (BOARD MEMBER)
- CHRISTOPHER CERA (PRESIDENT, D)
- KELI MCLOYD (SECRETARY, D)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to promote the health, dignity, and human rights of individuals who use drugs and communities impacted by drug use.
What it reported doing in 2022
When it was operational, Pennsylvania harm reduction coalition was actively involved in building and organizing the community of organizations and individuals aligned with our mission and values, as well as assisting other organizations in building and organizing their own communities to promote the health, dignity, and human rights of individuals who use drugs and communities impacted by drug use. Pennsylvania harm reduction coalition helped organizations with missions and values that are in-line with its own and believe lifting all lifts us too. The specific program partnerships and campaigns included Pennsylvania syringe services (pass), treatment overdose prevention (top), hero, Pennsylvania sheriffs law enforcement training, and servicing returning citizens (src).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.