Pennsylvania Crop Management Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 251483822
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2020–2020
Forms available: Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location: Port Royal, PA, USA
Phone: 7175274060
Rating: 84
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $121,801
Expenses: $121,966
Assets: $838
Liabilities: $6,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

DELROY ARTMAN (PRESIDENT - WEST BRANCH)

People named in this filing

DELROY ARTMAN (PRESIDENT - WEST BRANCH)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide crop management for farmers

What it reported doing in 2020

Provide crop management for farmers for the purpose of promoting sound crop management practices. They hire personnel to primarily scout fields, sample soils, calibrate equipment, establish recordkeeping and assist with pest, nutrient and crop management decision making.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 100
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 20
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.76; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -25% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $122K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
Schedules: 1 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.